After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are reviving these systems. Out of lie diagnosis tools tested at the line to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being made use of in asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs all their capacity to understand these devices and to follow their right for safety.
It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to access the channels of security. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who all are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technologies have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: even though they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental stars, and www.ascella-llc.com/what-is-the-due-diligence-data-room ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.